On Saturday 01 November 2008 20:18, Caroline Ford wrote: > 2008/11/2 Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 00:57:06 +0100 "Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT)" > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Hey, > > > > ... > > > >>I'm pondering on running a script to move all those which don't have > >>"jaunty" in debian/copyright to the "Needs work" section, leaving a > >>comment asking to change it to "jaunty", check the standards version > >>and some general recommendations (or perhaps just a link to a new wiki > >>page), so that we get ride of all those packages whose author isn't > >>coming back or which still need work anyway. > > > > ... > > > > I say do it. I'd archive anything older than (at a guess) 4 months. > > it's easy enough to get them back if someone is still interested. > > > > Scott K > > > > Scott K > > As someone with a package in REVU which no-one has ever looked why > would I make a new package for jaunty? My package is at least one > release cycle old and there's no guarantee anyone would look at it > this time round. >
There are always more packages than we have reviewers. Intrepid was particularly difficult in this regard. The why is up to you. Scott K -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
