-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 12:08:14AM +0000, James Westby wrote:
>Do you think that Luca's suggestion to follow you in Debian and pull >your revert of the SONAME, and then "un-transition" the packages that >we had rebuilt for the new SONAME is a good one? I generally believe that it is best for derivatives to keep as close as possible to their upstream as possible - from a technical point of view, disregarding other opinions about the Ubuntu "fork" specifically. In this case I see no "collateral damage" with this approach. But really I am not following Ubuntu closely so cannot reliably judge the implications (as example, when I a few years ago helped repackage the MoinMoin wiki engine for Ubuntu I was caught by your choice of switching to a newer default Python version). Good luck with this! - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAklzgvUACgkQn7DbMsAkQLj5ZwCgpVE9R49L9I3jSYAWB99TY13/ kMoAn3NvMzkpfe6ErxGDcSqCyyZheRXB =ja5T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
