On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:24:16 -0600 Nathan Handler <[email protected]> wrote: >On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'd suggest the automatically generated list be exposed on the package page >> on revu so that a MOTU doing a review can quickly look at the list and >> judge if the package is mature enough for a detailed review. If it's not, >> they can easily leave a comment like "1, 2, and 4 really need to be fixed >> before the package gets a detailed review. 3 is nice to have and add a >> lintian override for 5. It's OK as is." > >The idea was to have the automatic checks add a comment to the package >on REVU. I think this would be the clearest method of showing the >issues in the package to the uploader and MOTU reviewers. Is this >exposed enough, or should the issues found in the automatic checks be >shown in some other way?
I think it's fine as long as it doesn't automatically push the package to needs work. Scott K -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
