On 02/02/2009, at 22.15, Scott Kitterman wrote: > However good this list may be, it has no legitimate basis to be > considered > a "MOTU" input. > > Part of our process for role transfer includes a chance for community > review of such delegations. Until this has happened (I guess we now > have > that chance), I don't see any legitimacy to speak on our behalf. > > Alternatively, this list could have been based on input from the > community. > That didn't happen either. > > I'd like to ask you to withdraw this subission and instead give the > community a chance for input.
Your concern is completely legitimate. However, it was short notice, and wgrant and myself decided that we would try to represent the interest of the MOTUs as well as we could. We took this chance because none of the items on the list seemed really controversial. The items we chose to prioritize have to do with making our life as MOTUs easier, such as getting more efficient buildds, a user-interface for doing rebuilds easily, etc. Please take a look at the list. if anyone has any serious objections to our choices, please give us feedback and we'll see if we can get changes accepted. (Since there are N! ways of arranging N items, you should probably try to make your comments general in nature.) I hope this procedure will be acceptable to everyone. Cheers, Morten -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
