Thanks; that is much clearer! I agree with the general idea here. Any specific patchsys we would like ubuntu devs to add in particular?
On Oct 7, 2009, at 2:13 AM, fabrice <coutade...@gmail.com> wrote: > John Dong escribió: >> Can you clarify these two points? To my 2AM mind it reads as if the > > It's because my 7AM mind needs some coffee :-) > > let me rephrase it this way: > - if modification has already been done, stick to what the Debian > maintainer or Ubuntu is already doing. That mean use the existing > patch > system, if any, or modify directly the source if some modifications > has > already been done, but do not add a patch system. > - if it's a Debian package and no previous modifications has been > done, > modify directly the source, and do not introduce a patch system > - if it's an Ubuntu (-0ubuntuX) package and no previous modifications > has been done, adding a patch system is preferred > > Is that better? :-) > > Thanks, > Fabrice -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
