On 13 November 2013 09:25, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <[email protected]> wrote: >> Perhaps something changed about how dpkg-buildflags parses the option >> and it became more pedantic, or perhaps it wasn't providing that flag >> previously? > > maybe in fact it is saner like this. > >> It seems to work for me. > > I asked the upstream to double check this. > >> Sure, and thank you for considering Ubuntu users. > >> The details are at: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates. See >> the section labelled "Procedure". You'll need to prepare a justification >> and attach a debdiff to the bug. If you need help with this, try >> #ubuntu-motu on Freenode. > > In fact I do not have an ubuntu machine myself (I have a very old laptop), do > you have some ubuntu port machine available for DD ? > so I should prepare a package on it ?. >
ubuntu-dev-tools is available in Debian. In there there is handy pbuilder-dist, with which you can do: pbuilder-dist raring create; pbuilder-dist raring build *.dsc Or there is also mk-sbuild: mk-sbuild raring; sbuild -d raring *.dsc So exactly like in Debian you don't need to run sid to build packages for sid, same in Ubuntu you can run any OS (more or less) to build packages for any Ubuntu release. > I will personnaly upload to debian unstable to fix the LTP version of ubuntu > "LTP" ? Regards, Dmitrijs. -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
