On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 08:52:20AM -0700, Adam Conrad wrote: > We could have demoted it to proposed and held it out with a blocking > bug, approximating the "unstable only" situation in Debian. But I > guess removing and blacklisting doesn't hurt my feelings either. My > general gut feeling to any developer saying "this software isn't > good enough to be in a stable release" is "then it's not good enough > to be installed". There will always be one person who installs and > never upgrades, after all.
PPAs seem the be closest repository option in Ubuntu, and allow for automatic upgrades when appropriate. Are there other packages like this? Should we set up a more formal procedure for "blessed" / "supported" PPAs? Especially with software like Bitcoin, we want to protect users from rogue PPAs. Cheers, Neal McBurnett http://neal.mcburnett.org/ -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntufirstname.lastname@example.org Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu