Hope there will be passwords too ^^ Le ven. 15 mars 2013 19:00:17 CET, Bill Filler a écrit : > On 03/15/2013 01:43 PM, Kévin PEIGNOT wrote: >> Thanks ! >> >> That's right, I didn't thought about XUL (not sure it's XUL used in >> Firefox for Android), and consistency. >> >> Then about sync : For me it's really a must have. Sure Mozilla will >> someday port Firefox on Ubuntu Phone if it's a success, and I will wait >> this day to use Ubuntu touch on a daily base. The content I see on >> desktop/phones is almost the same (just mobile or classic version of the >> same sites), I want history to be synced between my devices, I want my >> bookmarks, and more of anything else : I NEED my passwords to be synced. >> And this is right for my professional use too (specially bookmarks) > No doubt syncing is an important usecase we are targetting. We will > most definitely use UbuntuOne (and u1db) as the framework to sync > between devices. Bookmarks, history and tabs will probably be the > first content to be synced with others coming later. > >> >> About the Webkit vs Gecko war, I'm not expert, but for me it doesn't >> change anything : I don't care. >> >> Thanks for your answers. >> >> Kévin >> >> Then I sync it should be possible to port Firefox Sync service to any >> other browser. a >> Le 15/03/2013 18:05, Michael Zanetti a écrit : >>> Hi >>> >>> Please not that I have not been part of the dicision making on the browser, >>> but I might give some ideas on why I for one would not pick firefox as the >>> main >>> browser for Ubuntu Touch: >>> >>> - Its look and feel is not made for Ubuntu Touch. In my opinion consistency >>> is >>> really important and having an application with differnt toolbar, color and >>> behavior is a bad thing. >>> >>> - It's not Qt. We decided to go for Qt with Ubuntu Touch. All other >>> applications are written in Qt. That makes it possible to share libraries >>> between them. Having to load xul and all others of firefox's dependencies >>> will >>> most certainly consume more memory than a browser that can share its libs >>> with >>> the rest of the system. >>> >>> I could think of more arguments like WebKit vs Gecko, Firefox's gestures >>> interfering with Ubuntu Touch gestures etc. Also I think the syncing >>> bookmarks >>> is not a totally valid use case as at least for me the content viewed on the >>> phone on the go is a totally different one than the one I read/view on my >>> PC. I >>> could agree that some poeple might want this though. >>> >>> Hope this gives some insight, >>> Michael >>> >>> On Friday 15 March 2013 17:50:58 Kévin PEIGNOT wrote: >>>> A question about the web browser : >>>> >>>> Why don't port Firefox Android on Ubuntu Phone ? It's really great, >>>> very touch friendly, and it's already possible to sync it with the >>>> desktop. >>>> >>>> If someone has an answer ! >>>> >>>> Kévin >>>> >>>> Le ven. 15 mars 2013 17:41:43 CET, [email protected] a écrit : >>>>> Shane, >>>>> For the browser see: >>>>> See Ubuntu Development Summit: "Web Browser Application for touch >>>>> devices" >>>>> http://summit.ubuntu.com/uds-1303/meeting/21621/appdev-1303-apps-webbrowse >>>>> r/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> and: >>>>> https://launchpad.net/webbrowser-app >> >> >> > > >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
