Hi! It really surprises me how misunderstood I am, I'll try to explain myself.
> I could help you set up the teams in > LP and set up the first revisions of the branches, but you'd have to > update the branches if you wanted to update the images. Just tell me to create additional teams, it's no problem, I already created two of them, didn't I? I'm just waiting for the confirmation to do so. And I will update them regularly as saucy gets installable by phablet-flash (because of the rule: no extra steps needed) > So there's no support for "--variant <something>" Of course, but it's no need for something like that, each variant has it's own unique codename. So in our case there is pollux (with LTE) and pollux_windy (WiFi only). Or for Note 10.1 there are four variants: n8000, n8010, n8013 and n8020. You get the idea. > I just thought it would have been nice if the images we offer through phablet-flash had been tested beforehand. All my images I provide have been tested by me or by the community (or at least no one complained that they don't boot), but I am testing them manually, by flashing them in recovery. > Can anyone help András with this? I already submitted a MR with my udev rules files, on the IRC chat ogra told me it will be the same as with the .config files a while back. On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Daniel Holbach <[email protected]>wrote: > Hello, > > On 07.08.2013 00:46, András Mamenyák wrote: > > Question I asked earlier, can I provide two device images with one > > maintainer team? Because I am providing pollux_windy image when you run > > that command, which could lead to problems when used with pollux device. > > Should I create separate teams for the same device, but different > > versions, (like with LTE, wifi only) or can you show me how to update > > the manifest to be able to support two or more devices? > > No, that's currently not possible. I could help you set up the teams in > LP and set up the first revisions of the branches, but you'd have to > update the branches if you wanted to update the images. > > phablet-flash is quite simple in this regard. If you tell it to "flash > community build <somename>". It will check if there's a manifest in > > lp:<somename>-image-dev/phablet-image-info/<somename> > > So there's no support for "--variant <something>". > > > > I think there is no reason to phablet-flash not to work if first it uses > > fastboot commands to install the boot and other device partitions and > > then going into the installed recovery to flash the ubuntu image. > > But wiping out everything is too much for me to test right now. > > I just thought it would have been nice if the images we offer through > phablet-flash had been tested beforehand. > > > > But the saucy image cannot be flashed with phablet until it needs the > > extra 70-* rules file, because it won't work, that's why it still has > > the non flipped image. > > Can anyone help András with this? > > Have a great day, > Daniel > -- > Get involved in Ubuntu development! developer.ubuntu.com/packaging > Follow @ubuntudev on identi.ca/twitter.com/facebook.com/G+ > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
