On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:46:48AM -0500, Pat McGowan wrote: > On 01/19/2014 06:44 PM, Sergio Schvezov wrote: > > Do we have an ETA to at least just define this? > > Do we have a process of what needs to be done after every release? > > > > Reason for asking it that the reminders app is ready for store upload, > > but I'm most certainly sure it won't work on all framework 13.10 > > supported releases (saucy). > What does it depend on that was not defined for 13.10? We talked about > defining a 13.10.1 early Feb for apps that require the recent additions > to the framework.
We shouldn't define things as 13.10.x when they aren't in saucy. It's confusing. > > We don't really need to have it in final form, since this is still > > moving along; but having the tag would be good to filter out where we > > know this is bound not to work. > The Qt 5.2 approach decision somewhat affects the timing and rollout for > the 14.04 tag. We also are waiting on the support for multiple > frameworks to land. I think we should stop waiting for the next thing to land, and simply define a 14.04 framework (possibly "beta" or similar, or else just defined as unstable) now. Otherwise we end up deadlocked. -- Colin Watson [[email protected]] -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
