On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 6:45 AM, Timo Jyrinki <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Daniel Holbach > <[email protected]> wrote: >> With the project almost ready to land, could we relax the "no regressions" >> policy for this particular landing? > > I agree with your rationale and a part of me would like to see "bite > the bullet", but there are several enough reasons to not do so. If > it'd be started soon and taking the risk, I can see how it could > potentially block everything else (including desktop - Unity 7 depends > on some things that depend on Qt 5) even until the feature freeze. And > then we would have broken images and not able to land other things on > time. One key thing to land on the desktop side is updated nux + > compiz + unity for this cycle. > > I believe that immediately after the FF is over (if not already), a > complete focus will be on landing 5.2 by fixing the remaining issues. > The Qt itself should be now "final", sans polishing, as of yesterday. > I've automated the PPA so far that maintaining the automatic builds by > itself is not much of an issue, but the downside is that the blockers, > old or new, are not immediately visible to everyone. The 5.2.1 in > there is now very new, so I expect a few new issues may need to be > found out. >
Do we have a list of AP results giving us a forecast what happens if if we drop the qt 5.2 into the current image? And yes, the "lets throw a nuke into the archive" approach is something we do not even want to discuss as an option here ... > -Timo > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
