On 25 February 2014 14:19, Ted Gould <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2014-02-25 at 12:00 +0100, Didier Roche wrote: > > As told yesterday in landing team email, we are blocking any landing > impacting Touch right now to get all focus and energy on fixing issues > without introducing newer one. > > > Not trying to be an ass about it, but isn't the process to drop the > offending packages and then move on? If the Android bits are broken, > release them at another time. I'm a bit confused at why all unrelated > releases are being stopped and this just not reverted as I thought that was > the process.
There are things that when landed, will cause regressions. The longer one holds them up, the worse it is in the long run. E.g. Qt 5.2 upload. I am disappointed in a stop-ship solution. Clearly we should re-align against the new (regressed) baselines, and continue to allow things in that don't regress things below the current baseline, and allow landing things that are unrelated, e.g. click apps, which by definition shouldn't be able to affect things outside their own confinement. -- Regards, Dimitri. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
