On 03/14/2014 11:50 AM, Didier Roche wrote: > 5. Apps in the store > In parallel, Alan is reaching out the application developers that needs a > rebuild and bumping their framework to work on the new image (they won't until > then). I guess that gives the week-end until we eventually take the decision > to > promote an image anyway, so seeing the few numbers of them, that should be > doable to get that ready before we promote the next image! > I realize we are obsoleting ubuntu-sdk-13.10 soon for a number of reasons and we won't obsolete a framework this quickly in the future. (that's fine)
However, as I was updating one of my apps just now I realized two problems: 1. we are going to force everyone to rebuild with ubuntu-sdk-14.04-dev1 (I thought we were going to use ubuntu-sdk-14.04-qml-dev1, ubuntu-sdk-14.04-html-dev1 and ubuntu-sdk-14.04-papi-dev1 anyway...) and then again with ubuntu-sdk-14.04-qml|html|papi in a few weeks. This seems less than ideal. 2. we are asking people to upload apps to the store with a framework (or qt5.2 for that matter) that doesn't yet exist on a promoted image. In theory, they can test the packaging changes by using --force-missing-framework with click install, but does pkcon install-local support that? (Aside: what will libclick do for base framework and base version if the framework is missing?) -- Jamie Strandboge http://www.ubuntu.com/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
