On 04/16/2014 01:11 PM, Martin Pitt wrote: >> And the convenience of lang packs would only be for things where we >> > are the upstream (and probably only things that are in the image >> > itself, rather than updated via clicks). > Yes, we agree (that's what I wrote as well). As I said, the langpack > concept makes a lot less sense on system images where it doesn't > matter which "package" the bit you update (a .mo file) came from. > Deb based language packs (for core stuff) do make sense when phone oem/service provider system images are created. Their rootfs gets just the languages they need (not all languages), saving disk.
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
