On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:08:56PM -0400, Rodney Dawes wrote: > On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 17:56 +0100, Iain Lane wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > > > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 03:38:58PM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > > > […] > > > Due to the CI train I can't just upload these or stage these in > > > lp:<project>, but we need MPs and verification, etc. As this won't > > > change anything at runtime it hardly makes sense to go through all > > > this fuss just for this change alone. > > > > IMHO you could upload for these. At the next train upload people will > > notice and then it will be trivial to sync the change back in. > > It's actually quite annoying to have changes pushed directly to the > archive for the things I manage that are in CI train. It means someone > is probably then also going to manually commit the change to trunk, and > sometimes the wrong version is used for the upload, or conflicts get > introduced. So I certainly prefer for things not to be uploaded direct > to the archive, but instead go through the standard MP and CI process > that all the changes we devs make must go through.
These are one line additions to debian/control. -- Iain Lane [ [email protected] ] Debian Developer [ [email protected] ] Ubuntu Developer [ [email protected] ]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
