On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 10:43:03PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 08:15:05AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 12:21:56AM +0200, Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak wrote: > > > #179 > > > - http://people.canonical.com/~lzemczak/landing-team/179.commitlog > > > > Since the ubuntu-rtm archive has been branched from 178 rather than 179, it > > seems to me that we would want to get all of the changes from the > > actually-promoted 179 into 178 as a group. Is this something that we should > > do with direct uploads to the ubuntu-rtm archive, or should these changes go > > through a silo for re-testing? > > Given that the plan is to bulk-update the RTM archive on the 19th > anyway, it seems prudent to me to test out that process with a small and > thus easily auditable set of changes. I'll therefore update the archive > to #179 by way of direct copies on Monday morning, and we can then see > about doing some test runs of CI Train after that's completed.
I've updated to #179 now, copying these packages: apport 2.14.5-0ubuntu4 aspell 0.60.7~20110707-1.1 autogen 1:5.18.3-6 binutils 2.24.51.20140807-1ubuntu2 busybox 1:1.22.0-8ubuntu1 codespeak-lib 1.4.23-1 crash 7.0.7-1ubuntu1 gnome-vfs 1:2.24.4-6ubuntu1 gnutls28 3.2.16-1ubuntu1 graphite2 1.2.4-3ubuntu1 lapack 3.5.0-3 libibverbs 1.1.8-1ubuntu1 libprelude 1.0.0-11.3ubuntu1 librevenge 0.0.1-3 libunity 7.1.4+14.10.20140808-0ubuntu1 libxvmc 2:1.0.8-2ubuntu1 location-service 2.0.1+14.10.20140808-0ubuntu1 ntfs-3g 1:2013.1.13AR.1-2ubuntu3 openldap 2.4.31-1+nmu2ubuntu9 pacemaker 1.1.10+git20130802-4ubuntu2 python-dbusmock 0.11.1-1 qtmir 0.4.1+14.10.20140808-0ubuntu1 qtmir-gles 0.4.1+14.10.20140808-0ubuntu1 qtubuntu 0.60+14.10.20140808.1-0ubuntu1 qtubuntu-gles 0.60+14.10.20140808.1-0ubuntu1 rsyslog 7.4.4-1ubuntu7 tcl8.5 8.5.15-4ubuntu1 telepathy-gabble 0.18.3-0ubuntu2 twm 1:1.0.8-1ubuntu1 unity8 8.00+14.10.20140808-0ubuntu1 The process for this seems to have gone smoothly. Some uploaders will have got some noisy e-mail about it, as we haven't yet fixed Launchpad to allow us to avoid that; we have an Asana task for that. Although it isn't on these images any more, gnutls26 doesn't actually get to fall out of the ubuntu-rtm distribution yet. As far as I can see, this is because of a chain of packages in the build-dependency closure of the touch-android seed that eventually ends up with libavformat55 -> libgnutls26. Fixing this before 2014-08-19 would be a good idea if at all possible. -- Colin Watson [[email protected]] -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
