On miércoles 13 de agosto de 2014 10h'01:17 ART, Michael Zanetti wrote:
On Wednesday 13 August 2014 12:13:34 Timo Jyrinki wrote:
2014-08-13 9:03 GMT+03:00 Timo Jyrinki <[email protected]>:
We could survive a bit longer by distro patching qtchooser (another
workaround), but I feel that eventually we'd like to have more control
on the QML app startups
For the Ubuntu specific new wrapper, discussion can continue on
ubuntu-phone.
Hmm... What is the reason for not doing it like all the rest of
the Qt world
does it? That is, having the SDK template generate a
minimalistic main.cpp and
a qtquickapplicationviewer.cpp which does the adaption for the
platform. Now
that the SDK seems to handle compilation just fine IMO that
would be the best
option. Also considering that in case we need to update something in there,
qtcreator already features a mechanism to automatically update
just that part.
Only benefit I see is to be architecture all.
Additional benefits would be to only have a binary to run
instead of exporting
paths, choosing some QQuickView wrapper and fiddling around with qml file
paths on the command line.
Br,
Michael
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
