On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 15:55 -0300, Martin Albisetti wrote: > On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Rodney Dawes > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > But users may not consider that to be the main focus. If as a user, I do > > not want to use scopes, and am looking for apps, I shouldn't have the > > app hidden from me, because I'm choosing to only view the apps in the > > store. The store interface isn't about what developers want, it's about > > what users want. > > My biggest fear with implementing access to either scope or app > transparently, is users being surprised when they install a scope and > get an app along with it.
I don't think that will be an issue. Scopes interaction is very simplistic. If you need to provide any deeper interaction beyond just searching some data to look at, you're almost certainly going to have to provide an app (or you're going to rely on the browser working with your site, and a webapp will provide a better experience there anyway), and so I think it will be more expected than surprising.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
