On 06.07.2015 16:29, Alberto Mardegan wrote: > On 07/02/2015 11:45 AM, Michael Zanetti wrote: >> On 02.07.2015 09:06, Alberto Mardegan wrote: >>> On 02.07.2015 07:24, Victor Thompson wrote: >>>> I was going to file a bug against a number of apps that I think >>>> need to add the ability to be side-staged on a tablet. >>> >>> Maybe I'm missing something essential, but shouldn't it be that >>> the sidestage option is automatically available for all apps >>> developed for the phone and which can run in portrait mode? When >>> in the sidestage they'll be running roughly at the same size >>> that they take when running in the phone, won't they? > >> No. By default an app gets to the main stage on a tablet. At least >> for now, an app has to explicitly specify that it wants to be on >> the side stage. > > I do agree that the default behaviour should be to get the main stage. > > However, my understanding (based on old designs, maybe) was that *the > user* has the ability to decide to open an application on the side stage. > Or to send an application from the main stage to the side stage, and > vice-versa.
That's the plan, yes. Still, the app needs to specify that it can run on both, main- and side stage for that.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
