El día Wednesday, July 22, 2015 a las 10:30:29PM -0700, Nathan Haines escribió:
> On 07/22/2015 10:27 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > No. The comparisation you use is wrong. It is like: you get a call and
> > you do not want to pick it up for whatever reason. And the service
> > provider gives to the caller the message "phone was ringing, I know the
> > person is sitting next to the phone, but unwilling to pick it up"
>
> Which can't really happen the way Telegram is designed. But even then,
> this is very easily deduced--especially if the call goes to voicemail in
> under 30 seconds.
>
> The point is, Telegram is designed to be used with trusted, identified
> persons, not strangers. There's nothing wrong with finding it unuseful
> or undesirable for any reason, but complaining that it does the thing it
> was designed to do is more than a little silly.
The point is, that even between trusted and identified person every side
should be able to let the sender in the unsureness if the message
arrived to his/her eyes or not. This is what privacy is called and which
is violated by Telegram.
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz, [email protected], http://www.unixarea.de/ +49-176-38902045
No! Nein! ¡No! Όχι! -- Ευχαριστούμε!
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
