On 07/24/2015 11:46 AM, Bogdan Cuza wrote: > Yes, it seems like this (I installed the app trough pkcon, with > allow-unconfined). I should elaborate on the fact that it doesn't cause a > stop, my url was miswritten, the xhr works, but it still prints this. >
That is not a complete apparmor denial. Can you please check in /var/log/syslog. grep DENIED /var/log/syslog should find the full message. Please not that apparmor can and will block communication between confined and unconfined processes if the confined process does not explicitly allow communicating with unconfined. So even if your app is unconfined, certain communications via dbus may be denied. > Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 07:46:17 -0500 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Ubuntu-phone] XHR doesn't work because of apparmor > > On 07/24/2015 04:40 AM, Bogdan Cuza wrote: >> Actually, that didn't work. I just tested on another device. I tested 2 apps, >> one of which is unconfined, same denial. >> > You are getting an apparmor denial with an unconfined app? > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected]; [email protected] >> Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:45:05 +0700 >> Subject: Re: [Ubuntu-phone] XHR doesn't work because of apparmor >> >> I solved this by using: >> "if (xhr.readyState == 4) { >> if (xhr.status == 200) {" >> instead of XMLHttpRequest.DONE. Hope this helps someone :) >> >> >> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 15:49:27 +0200 >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Ubuntu-phone] XHR doesn't work because of apparmor >> >> Probably related to this bug: >> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor-easyprof-ubuntu/+bug/1404188 >> >> It prints the same apparmor denial. >> >> Br, >> Michael >> >> On 23.07.2015 15:06, Bogdan Cuza wrote: >>> Hello! >>> >>> I am having some issues with a XmlHttpRequest. The response is null, >>> even though it passes req.readyState == XMLHttpRequest.DONE. The log >>> reports this: >>> >>> QNetworkManagerInterface::QNetworkManagerInterface(QObject*) propsReply >>> "An AppArmor policy prevents this sender from sending this message to >>> this recipient; type="method_call", sender=":1.465" (uid=32011 pid=22453 >>> comm="/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/qt5/bin/qmlscene $@ q") >>> interface="org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties" member="GetAll" error >>> name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" >>> destination="org.freedesktop.NetworkManager" (uid=0 pid=1245 >>> comm="NetworkManager ")" >>> >>> QNetworkManagerInterface::QNetworkManagerInterface(QObject*) nmReply "An >>> AppArmor policy prevents this sender from sending this message to this >>> recipient; type="method_call", sender=":1.465" (uid=32011 pid=22453 >>> comm="/usr/lib/arm-linux-gnueabihf/qt5/bin/qmlscene $@ q") >>> interface="org.freedesktop.NetworkManager" member="GetDevices" error >>> name="(unset)" requested_reply="0" >>> destination="org.freedesktop.NetworkManager" (uid=0 pid=1245 >>> comm="NetworkManager ")" >>> "Object path cannot be empty" >>> "Object path cannot be empty" >>> >>> My apparmor has "networking" in policy_groups. Could anyone help me with >>> this? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Bogdan >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : >> [email protected] Unsubscribe : >> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : >> https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : >> [email protected] Unsubscribe : >> https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : >> https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> > > > -- > Jamie Strandboge http://www.ubuntu.com/ > > > > -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : > [email protected] Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : > https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
