Scopes, by design, are information providers, and interaction with them is deliberately kept to a minimum. In return, we get scopes that are stateless, take up minimal resources, don't need access to a display surface, and start up in a fraction of a second.
The way to make scopes interactive to bundle them with an app. The scope surfaces content and, when more sophisticated interactions are required, the scope can notify the app, which then takes over for the fancy stuff. Cheers, Michi. On 31 Aug 2015, at 0:28 , Krzysztof Tataradziński <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > I'm thinking does Canonical has got any plan for make scope more > 'interactive'? > Lets see NearBy - we can look at places from Yelp's database and eventually > see it on HERE Maps. > First - is there any possibility to change default map app? I mean I would > love if we click on map button in Nearby scope -> Yelp we can select to show > that place in GPS Navigation or OSMScout. Is that the Scope problem of maps > developers? > Second - why NearBy shows places from Yelp only? Why not to use Google > Places? Great solution would be to add that source and allow users to turn it > on/off. > Third - for me, most of scopes look nice, present data clearly, but still > nothing more and only similar to RSS feeds, not very interactive at all. In > example again Nearby -> Yelp - why scope don't allow to rate place, add new > one, etc.? Only opens website. Is there limitation of Yelp itself or > technology used in Scope or it's just a matter of time and resource and > someone will make that possible? > > Best regards, > Krzysztof Tataradziński > https://launchpad.net/~ktatar156 > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
