On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Alan Pope <[email protected]> wrote: > On 1 October 2015 at 15:52, Michał Sawicz <[email protected]> wrote: >> I would love for us to have this discussion in a manner "I have this use >> case, how do you plan / how can we enable it in the given constraints" >> instead of plain "you don't support this, change it!". >> >> > > Where would you propose we track these use cases? And what criteria do > we use for determining their validity, priority and so on? >
I would propose to have a "virtual" launchpad project "ubuntu-application-lifecycle" that users can file bugs against. With that, we get tagging (like phone/desktop relevant) and a priority for free. On top, it is easy to tackle those "bugs" or use-cases as part of our usual ota/development cadence. > I too would love to see some of these use cases fixed. I've had a few > apps ideas which never got off the drawing board because I know the > lack of background processing kills the ideas dead, so I'm as > interested as everyone to know what path I can take, and what > expectations I should have. > To state this clearly: I do care about those use-cases, too. However, as saviq points out correctly: The discussion has to evolve from a pure "Does not work for me, change it" to a more in-depth conversation that allows us to tackle the actual problems instead of blindly giving up our principles and guidelines. Cheers, Thomas > Cheers, > -- > Alan Pope > Community Manager > > Canonical - Product Strategy > +44 (0) 7973 620 164 > [email protected] > http://ubuntu.com/ > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
