What about making it a privileged service? Like allowing an application location access or camera access. The user could choose what apps store what where.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:31 AM, Stefano Verzegnassi < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > At the moment, only core apps (and system apps) are authorized to > access the SD card. > This has been debated a lot in the past, but it's surely a big > limitation for those apps which would be forced to store a large > amount of data in the internal storage (I'm using my Ubuntu Phone for > recording audio tracks of my lessons, it's >160MB of OGG audio in a > single day). > > Is there any plan to extend the current AppArmor policy, and register > e.g. '/media/*/*/Ubuntu Apps/<app_id>' (or something similar) as > writable location for storage, keeping the other folders in the SD > card confined? > > Cheers, > Stefano > > -- > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
