As I point people to UF when they ask, I so feel that this is a section under used.
Regards, Phill. On 15 January 2013 04:11, komputes <[email protected]> wrote: > On 13-01-14 09:38 PM, cprofitt wrote: > >> On Mon, 2013-01-14 at 09:44 +0000, Mike Heald wrote: >> >>> On 13/01/13 17:43, cprofitt wrote: >>> >>>> I tried making UF today, but was unable to do so. The error message >>>> >>> I >> >>> got was: >>>> >>>> ---- >>>> Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement >>>> egenix-mx-base==3.2.4 (from -r requirements.txt (line 2)) (from >>>> versions: ) >>>> No distributions matching the version for egenix-mx-base==3.2.4 >>>> >>> (from -r >> >>> requirements.txt (line 2)) >>>> ---- >>>> >>>> I was also unable to install "Unable to locate package >>>> python-egenix-mx", but I am not 100% sure that they are related. >>>> >>>> I think it will help the project if we can build a good step-by-step >>>> guide to build UF. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've been ill for the past few days, so sorry for not replying >>> >> sooner. >> >>> I'll get on to the queries over the next day or so as I catch up with >>> work I've missed. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Mike >>> >> >> Mike: >> >> Let me know what I can do to help. >> >> Everyone on the QA list: >> >> We are having a conversation about getting Ubuntu Friendly rolling >> again. It was suggested after some brief initial conversations that we >> move the discussion to this list. >> >> Ubuntu Friendly: >> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/**UbuntuFriendly<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuFriendly> >> >> https://friendly.ubuntu.com/ >> >> The site is done in Django and the LP site is here: >> >> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-**friendly<https://launchpad.net/ubuntu-friendly> >> >> >> Please let us know if you are interested in assisting with getting >> Ubuntu Friendly rolling as a community driven project. >> >> >> Charles Profitt >> >> >> > Yes please include me Charles. I have always been interested in setting up > a hardware compatibility database for Ubuntu. The idea of UF is amazing, > but the limitation I run into on a regular basis with UF is that only > entire systems are shown. Why is this a limitation? > > How often do you find the exact same system these days? Duplication (in > this context a good thing, as it confirms compatibility) is low because > models are not exactly the same. From one week to another, one batch to > another, a manufacturer can change hardware components making it a new > system. > > Therefore I suggest that if we have a chance to improve UF, we make it > component based (USB and PCI ID based). Please contact me if you are > interested in discussing this improvement. > > -- > -komputes > > (]( -. .- )[) > > > -- > Ubuntu-quality mailing list > [email protected].**com <[email protected]> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/** > mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-**quality > > -- > <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality> > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw >
-- Ubuntu-quality mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
