On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Jun Ma <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Nicholas, > > I totally agree with your suggestion about a core group dedicated to push > all flavor QA. I am very glad to contribute to this work. As Ali said , some > flavors may have few testers. We can cooperate between different flavors to > solve some difficult common problems. >
Hi Jun Ma, I am glad that I found one of UbuntuKylin people and had the chance to chat to :) Thank you for joining and showing your interest :) In this case, this is what we have so far: Ali (me) to be the driver for this project (unless someone has a serious problem with that :P) I will take care of: 1. Handling the communications between the members of the recruiting group 2. Find more testers for Ubuntu GNOME (what I usually do, daily) 3. Help Lubuntu Team until the position of QA Lead either get Phill back or maybe someone else (I do wish and like to see Phill get back to where he belongs) 4. I am already admin for Ubuntu Quality Facebook (Page and Group) and Google+ (Page and Community) so that will be good to attract more users to join and test. Jackson: To find more testers for Xubuntu Team Howard To take care of: 1. Co-driver for the recruiting group 2. Find more testers for Ubuntu Studio 3. Fine more testers for Edubuntu ?? Jun Ma To find more testers for UbuntuKylin Ted To find more testers for Myth and Ubuntu Studio (??) So far, if everyone agrees and confirms, the above names will work closely to find more testers for their teams and the community in general. Now, who will take if for: Ubuntu Kubuntu I think both Ubuntu and Kubuntu have enough testers but I can't speak on their behalf, and the more, the better but let's understand one simple fact that we found this group to help those communities which have shortage with testers. I do suggest to focus our efforts for those in need at the beginning. 3-5 active testers is really bad. We need to assist those communities. Our team are now calling for more volunteers to contribute for > UbuntuKylin Beta1 by holding a "Finding bugs" community activity. This is > our attempt to find a more effective model for flavor testing. But > the language difference may be the first problem we have to face. So I > think multi-language is essential for regular local testers :P > I thought you guys don't need more? :P You have the highest population on earth :D But sure, the more, the better :) And yes, the language issue is important indeed. > > Best regards > maclin > UbuntuKylin Quality Team > Nice to meet you :) Thank you! -- Remember: "All of us are smarter than any one of us."* *Best Regards, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad My Projects: IamNewToLinux <http://iamnewtolinux.blogspot.com/> - StartUbuntu Project<https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/CommunicationsTeam/WOWLubuntu/StartUbuntu> - Linux Brainstorming <https://www.facebook.com/groups/352004991569676/> - Mubuntu<http://amjjawad.blogspot.com/2013/07/draft-mubuntu-simple-minimal-system.html>
-- Ubuntu-quality mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
