In the triage guide (http://tinyurl.com/kz4netu) there's a list for
suggested bugs for being triaged, which basically is one of reports
being untouched and not confirmed.
Although confirming bugs could be taken into consideration, for triaging
wouldn't it be better to suggest confirmed bugs instead?
Also it seems to me that shorting bugs with higher heat rather than with
higher importance could be a good idea for triaging, since you will be
looking at bugs with higher appearance first in a phase where most bugs
haven't got any importance set yet.
So the list will be:
<https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.searchtext=&field.status%3Alist=CONFIRMED&orderby=-heat>
What do you think?
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
