On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 19:47:00 +0100 Alberto Salvia Novella <[email protected]> wrote:
> Brian Murray: > > I think this is a false assumption, in that the people setting the bug's > > importance to critical know the definition of critical and are able to > > independently judge the bug's importance. Some Launchpad user reporting > > or experiencing the bug report is much more likely to think their bug > > report is critical. Subsequently, I think your numbers are quite low and > > optimistic. > > > > Another consideration is that the Ubuntu Bug Control mailing list is > > moderated so any emails sent to it will need to be approved by an > > administrator. I'd like it if a different system were used. > > Perhaps we could direct those warnings to me for a while, collect > metrics, and decide on those. > > > I don't think pinging Brian Murray or other bug squad admins would be good if it ends up someone thinks ubiquity is broken when it was a bad burn or dd of an iso or bad md5sum.This is what the iso testing tracker is for. -- Brendan Perrine <[email protected]> -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
