On Tue, May 05, 2015 at 01:31:48PM +0200, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote: > Alberto Salvia Novella: > > I wonder if <https://errors.ubuntu.com/> isn't working too. > > Brian Murray: > >The graph being broken doesn't mean the whole website "isn't working" > >which is what your first email indicated. > > Precision isn't one of my values, because that's the automatic > consequence of simplicity.
I think it is really unfortunate that you don't value precision, as being precise promotes clarity which allows people reading your work to better understand why you made an action or statement. This particularly important in the distributed and collaborative work environment that is Ubuntu development. Were you just to have said exactly what you thought was wrong it would have saved both of us time. > Brian Murray: > > Additionally, a bug report would have been useful. > > I opened a bug report about a different flaw in the Error Tracker, > and never got attended. So I figured out that the best use of my > time wasn't reporting errors, but helping with them. This is again another example of your lack of precision, not telling us the bug number you reported, such that no one reading this list can go confirm that bug and I wasted time looking for it. I hope you'll take some time to reconsider the value of precision and how a lack of it negatively effects the rest of the Ubuntu community. -- Brian Murray
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- Ubuntu-quality mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
