On 26/04/16 17:01, Brian Murray wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:50:09PM +0100, [email protected] wrote:
On 26/04/16 15:36, Alberto Salvia Novella wrote:
...
No.
This is not about bug importance at all.
That is a different issue.
What I am saying is that adding HundredPaperCuts - then that never changing
- mucks up our bug tracking.
Could you elaborate on how having a task for a project that isn't Ubuntu
affects your ability to track the bug?
Thanks!
--
Brian Murray
Not sure exactly - but our tracker isn't able to differentiate between
packages/projects on a bug afaik.
Consequently - bugs we know are fixed end up showing other statuses.
The same would apply if say for instance a thunar bug ended up with
maybe gvfs affecting - our tracker wouldn't differentiate - that's not a
problem - they're both real issues at that point.
Our 'problem' with the 100 paper cuts issue - is that while they may
eventually get marked as fixed - it's not when our tracker 'should' be
showing it - but some indeterminate point in the future.
That project 'might' point issues out to others who 'might' do something
towards fixing a bug - but experience shows us that xubuntu bugs are
almost always fixed 'in-house' or at Xfce , consequently it makes life
hard for us - and we're all working towards the same thing hopefully - a
strong *buntu community.
--
Ubuntu-quality mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
