On Mon, 12 Dec 2016 03:45:31 -0500 JMZ <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/11/2016 07:12 PM, teo teo wrote: > > <snip> > > 2) sticking to an LTS for 2 f***ing years means sticking to > > tremendously obsolete software, usually full of bugs that have > > already been fixed upstream (by the way that is usually already > > true when the ubuntu release is brand new, let alone two years > > later), > <snip> > > I know, someone's going to think, "don't feed the troll". Hear me > out. Teo teo's concerns about LTS are not trollish. Users who elect > to run LTS rather than incremental releases must, at some point, > maintain the system with more current debs which approximate the > incremental upgrades. I always follow the incremental upgrades, as > I'd rather fix a version which is farther along in development than > LTS. I never fully understood why a individual user would use LTS. > LTS is better suited to a circumstance where uniformity is prized, > such as small businesses, corporations, libraries etc. Teo teo is > certainly right that an LTS plan of action has significant deficits.
That might be true (that Teo's concerns may be important). Nevertheless, s/he behaves in a trollish way, and *intentionally* has been evading moderation. S/he is moderated again. I personally do not care if these concerns are valid or not -- I stopped reading her/his comments the moment they went to Trollland. There are many ways of raising an issue. The way s/he does it is not acceptable on the Ubuntu ecosystem. Cheers, ..C..
pgpo3LiiO9l3G.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Ubuntu-quality mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
