Hello Ross! Per process, we always mark a milestone released once it's released. Since Beta has been released on 1st of April, we switched it to the 'Released' state (which caused it to appear as "(archived)"). Testing of the beta images no longer make sense via the iso-tracker as we will not be re-releasing Beta - it's done, it's closed and we now focus on our road to release - dailies make much more sense now. I think it was always like this, per the process document here [1] (last task of the 'Release' day).
Cheers, [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BetaProcess On Sat, 3 Apr 2021 at 12:47, Ross Gammon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Why is the Beta archived? Surely it should only be archived after the > next milestone in the series is released? > > On 02/04/2021 17:59, Paride Legovini wrote: > > Ian Bruntlett wrote on 02/04/2021: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I tried reporting this on > >> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/422/builds but it said > >> it was > >> "(archived)". > > > > Hi Ian, > > > > It says "(archived)" because the beta images have been released already. > > If you want to report an issue with the ISO images the first step is > > to file a bug on Launchpad against the buggy component, and then link > > the bug to the "daily" builds in the ISO tracker. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Paride > > > > It seems wrong to to test the Beta image and then file a bug against the > Daily image, which is not what you tested. > > This has wasted a lot of my time today. I tried submitting results on > several browsers and computers before I read this thread and realised > why I hadn't been able to do it. > > Ross > > > -- > Ubuntu-quality mailing list > [email protected] > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality -- Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak Foundations Team [email protected] www.canonical.com -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
