On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:13:05PM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > There was a discussion tonight about changes to build systems (e.g. > pycentral/pysupport to dh_python2 or cdbs to dh) and if they require an FFe. > I have always thought they did, but at least one developer was suprised. > > IMO fixing a broken build system is one thing, redesigning it post-FF is > another (I've already uploaded on fix to the archive for a package that was > uploaded and built an empty package due to a faulty dh_python2 transition). > > This should probably be clarified.
Your position made sense to me - often desirable, easy to approve based on debdiff/debc/build-log etc., but worth putting through extra review at this point since it's relatively easy to produce broken binaries by accident with such changes. -- Colin Watson [[email protected]] -- Ubuntu-release mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
