Hey Robert,

Robert Park [2016-07-11 15:43 -0700]:
> I had a brief look at the code and it appears that an empty file will
> pacify it, so I've done this:
> 
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/+branch/bileto/revision/580#britney/fetch-indexes
> 
> And it does appear to have "worked" (eg it stopped the traceback).
> Please advise if this is correct or if I need to be doing something
> more with this new Dates file.

That's correct. This was part of the bit of "noise" that was the
remaining difference -- support for dates was made optional first, and
then later half-reverted as we now always have Dates on snakefruit.

Thanks!

Martin
-- 
Martin Pitt                        | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com)  | Debian Developer  (www.debian.org)

-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release

Reply via email to