On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:07:17AM +0100, Robie Basak wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 05:00:09PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > > If that means you agree with Dimitri's recommendations regarding ignorable > > autopkgtest failures, could you please update > > lp:~ubuntu-sru/britney/hints-ubuntu-xenial accordingly with badtest hints?
> I checked and was satisfied that the autopkgtest failures did not > represent regressions caused by systemd in xenial-proposed. > You want me to update the badtest hints retrospectively? The specific > versions of the failures aren't available on the pending-sru page any > more. Is there anywhere else I can grab them from? > For next time, do we have a policy of always adding badtest hints before > ignoring autopkgtest failures? If not always, what criteria should I use > to decide if I should do this? Since the goal is to eventually use britney to promote SRUs (in order to give us additional safeguards about installability that we currently lack), I think always add the necessary hints to make the SRU pass according to the proposed-migration report (e.g. http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/bionic/update_excuses.html). For historical autopkgtest results, you can find these under e.g. http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/nplan/xenial/armhf -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ [email protected] [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Ubuntu-release mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
