On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 06:07:09PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> Over the last few weeks, I've been working on rebasing our extensive 
> delta to proposed-migration. It's now at a state where it's ready for 
> others to take a look at. Please check out the output from a dry-run 
> (being re-run hourly from cron)
> 
>   
> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/laney/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html
>   
> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/laney/proposed-migration/update_output.txt

Update on this: Testing found a couple of bugs. I think I've fixed them.

They were mainly around arch:all handling. In Debian, these packages are 
usually built on separate buildds, and britney had made a couple of 
assumptions that relied on this.

I'm thinking that I'll make the cut over on Thursday UK time, so please 
have a look at the output before then and check your .yaml-parsing 
scripts against the new output (location changed since my initial post; 
it's now .xz compressed)

  
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/laney/proposed-migration/update_excuses.yaml.xz

Cheers,

-- 
Iain Lane                                  [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer                                   [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer                                   [ la...@ubuntu.com ]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
Ubuntu-release mailing list
Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release

Reply via email to