Hi Lukasz, Em 27/06/2022 06:34, Lukasz Zemczak escreveu: > Hello Lucas! > > Thanks for submitting the MRE. It looks decent, I'm willing to approve > it as it is. > > Checking the upstream CI tests, I like it that they have so many > different tests running on Ubuntu - that's a plus for sure. But I > guess they're all running on focal, right? Do you know if they're > running any other Ubuntu versions for their various testing?
Unfortunately, they are running tests only on Focal. > It's certainly a bit unfortunate that the autopkgtest/buildtime > testing story isn't great. I appreciate their upstream testing story > on Ubuntu, but autopkgtests give us the power to know the testing > state on the exact series and, also, whether other, dependent package > changes won't regress haproxy itself. So please continue working on > improving the ADT testing story for the future! Sure, we will keep working to improve them. I believe we do not need to be so worried with HAProxy affecting other packages in the archive because it is almost a leaf package, in all the 3 LTS releases it has only 2 reverse dependencies which are: * neutron-metadata-agent * neutron-ovn-metadata-agent > Is there any exploratory testing one can do in the meantime? Or do the > existing autopkgtests handle all the base testing already? I think autopkgtest is enough to catch regressions for now, they cover the most common use-case scenarios I believe. My idea is to increase the coverage adding tests for new features and some corner cases. > Anyway, we can always improve on the process. I'll add this exception > to the exception list now - you may proceed with preparing updates. Thank you very much for approving this exception. I'll start to work on the updates as soon as I can. -- Lucas Kanashiro -- Ubuntu-release mailing list Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
