On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 03:21:01PM -0700, Brian Murray wrote: > I happened to be looking at long running tests in the autopkgtest > database today and discovered openjdk-lts has a rather long run time. > This then resulted in me looking at the autopkgtest-package-configs > where I found the following:
> big_packages:openjdk-lts/amd64 > big_packages:openjdk-lts/arm64 > big_packages:openjdk-lts/armhf > big_packages:openjdk-lts/i386 > big_packages:openjdk-lts/ppc64el > big_packages:openjdk-lts/s390x > never_run:openjdk-lts/arm64/bionic > never_run:openjdk-lts/arm64/focal > never_run:openjdk-lts/arm64/groovy > never_run:openjdk-lts/arm64/hirsute > never_run:openjdk-lts/armhf/bionic > never_run:openjdk-lts/armhf/hirsute > never_run:openjdk-lts/i386/bionic > never_run:openjdk-lts/ppc64el/bionic > never_run:openjdk-lts/s390x/bionic > Given that openjdk-lts's test results[1] are neutral could we just move it > to never run? > [1] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/openjdk-lts openjdk-lts sees security updates every 3 months which carry with them a significant risk of regression due to the complexity of both the package and the patches that are included upstream in security drops. Please do not move it to never_run, we definitely want to know when these test results go from 'neutral' to 'failed'. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- Ubuntu-release mailing list Ubuntu-release@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-release
