After some more discussion on IRC, for Alberto's use case he will lock
the header. I will close this bug. In UITK2 we probably will not try to
automatically set the topMargin of the flickable, and leave it to the
app developer so there will be full freedom (at the cost of a few extra
lines of code in the apps).

** Summary changed:

- [regression] Double header height is set as flickable topMargin
+ Header adds to Flickable topMargin instead of replacing it.

** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu)
       Status: In Progress => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
SDK bug tracking, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572525

Title:
  Header adds to Flickable topMargin instead of replacing it.

Status in Canonical System Image:
  In Progress
Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix

Bug description:
  Th attached test application works fine under qml-module-ubuntu-
  components 1.3.1918+16.04.20160404-0ubuntu3 but breaks with the latest
  1.3.1938+16.04.20160416. At a first examination, I believe that the
  change which cause the regression is this one:

  https://code.launchpad.net/~tpeeters/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/invisible-
  header-topmargin/+merge/290659

  Run the attached test case with QML scene. You can scroll the view
  horizontally to see the other model items. Under the old version of
  the toolkit, all items have their page headers correctly aligned; with
  the new version, an extra spacing is added below the header.

  I found this bug while testing my ttrss app in rc-proposed; please
  don't let this UITK version reach our users, as more apps might be
  affected.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1572525/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sdk-bugs
Post to     : ubuntu-sdk-bugs@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-sdk-bugs
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to