There's no regression potential per se because this doesn't affect the current Maas operation as this will only be in effect if the user enables the capability. Other than that this has been QA'd and testes on the field. On Apr 11, 2014 4:50 AM, "Dave Walker" <davewal...@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> I really struggle to support this change. It is a clearly impactful > change. FFe raised on the day of Final Freeze. Feels rushed. There is > no commentary on the regression potential, or the testing done. > > Not to mention that RC1 was happily released with a broken MAAS > installer, that took 2 weeks to fix. This lowers general confidence in > the attention to detail, and this upload could be similar. > > This feels like a hardware enablement change that is better suited as a > post-release SRU once it is well tested and the general churn has > calmed. I do not see a valid reason why this needs to be on the release > ISO.. it isn't an install time requirement? > > I'm stopping short of outright NACK'ing this, but am rejecting the > upload from the queue to avoid it being accepted by mistake. > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1305839 > > Title: > FFe: Support for Third Party Driver Installation > > To manage notifications about this bug go to: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1305839/+subscriptions > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to maas in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1305839 Title: FFe: Support for Third Party Driver Installation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maas/+bug/1305839/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
