** Description changed:
+ =============================================
+ SRU Justification
+ same justification as for bug 1358835. It would
+ be great to have the same test cases run as in that
+ bug.
+ =============================================
+
In bug 1358835 we applied a fix to supress a warning. The patch is different
from upstream (and appears wrong).
In particular,
+ if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(numa_nodes_ptr, node)) {
becomes
+ if (f) {
Switch to a straight cherrypick of the upstream patch.
** Description changed:
=============================================
SRU Justification
same justification as for bug 1358835. It would
be great to have the same test cases run as in that
bug.
+
+ The fix uploaded in that bug is wrong, in particular the diff between
+ the two patches includes:
+
+ -+ if (f) {
+ ++ if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(numa_nodes_ptr, node)) {
+
+ "if (f)" is a bogus test, f is simply an opened file.
=============================================
In bug 1358835 we applied a fix to supress a warning. The patch is different
from upstream (and appears wrong).
In particular,
+ if (numa_bitmask_isbitset(numa_nodes_ptr, node)) {
becomes
+ if (f) {
Switch to a straight cherrypick of the upstream patch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to numactl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1535494
Title:
Fix numa_node_to_cpus patch
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/numactl/+bug/1535494/+subscriptions
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
