Public bug reported: When executing pacemaker i386 autopkgtests I realized that package "resource-agents" wasn't available for i386. When discussing this with @vorlon we came into the conclusion that some i386 only cluster packages could be removed from the repository, towards the effort of having *only the essential* packages available in i386 (to be run together with an amd64 host).
IRC log: """ <rafaeldtinoco> resource-agents i386 binary package <vorlon> the pacemaker binary is /not/ present on i386 in the release pocket <vorlon> that may have been an overly aggressive removal <rafaeldtinoco> vorlon: are u keeping pacemaker because of dependencies ? <vorlon> yeah, I removed it when I shouldn't have (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/i386/pacemaker) <vorlon> rafaeldtinoco: pacemaker-dev is a build-dep of something else we need, see the referenced germinate output for full details https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate- output/i386.focal/i386+build-depends <vorlon> pacemaker-dev is a build-dep of dlm <vorlon> and libesmtp-dev is a build-dep of pacemaker, not the other way around <vorlon> (and dlm is a build-dep of lvm2) <rafaeldtinoco> ah gotcha <rafaeldtinoco> dlm -> corosync -> pacemaker <vorlon> so, even though I removed the binary in error from the release pocket, the right answer is still for pacemaker/i386 binary to go away (leaving only the -dev and lib packages) <vorlon> do you want me to fix that up, or do you want to? <rafaeldtinoco> to fix that we should do like we did to samba ? <vorlon> yeah <vorlon> looks like the binaries you'll need to drop are pacemaker, pacemaker-cli-utils, pacemaker-remote <vorlon> and I'll remove those from -proposed right now, so that those don't hold up migration <vorlon> but I'll hold off on adding the hint until they're dropped from the source <rafaeldtinoco> deal, and next hint ill do with proper branch """ ** Affects: pacemaker (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: Rafael David Tinoco (rafaeldtinoco) Status: In Progress ** Affects: pacemaker (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Medium Assignee: Rafael David Tinoco (rafaeldtinoco) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: pacemaker (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: pacemaker (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: pacemaker (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Rafael David Tinoco (rafaeldtinoco) ** Description changed: + When executing pacemaker i386 autopkgtests I realized that package + "resource-agents" wasn't available for i386. When discussing this with + @vorlon we came into the conclusion that some i386 only cluster packages + could be removed from the repository, towards the effort of having *only + the essential* packages available in i386 (to be run together with an + amd64 host). - When executing pacemaker i386 autopkgtests I realized that package "resource-agents" wasn't available for i386. When discussing this with @vorlon we came into the conclusion that some i386 only cluster packages could be removed from the repository, towards the effort of having *only the essential* packages available in i386 (to be run together with an amd64 host). + IRC log: + """ <rafaeldtinoco> resource-agents i386 binary package <vorlon> the pacemaker binary is /not/ present on i386 in the release pocket <vorlon> that may have been an overly aggressive removal <rafaeldtinoco> vorlon: are u keeping pacemaker because of dependencies ? <vorlon> yeah, I removed it when I shouldn't have (https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/i386/pacemaker) <vorlon> rafaeldtinoco: pacemaker-dev is a build-dep of something else we need, see the referenced germinate output for full details - - https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/i386.focal/i386+build-depends - + https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate- + output/i386.focal/i386+build-depends <vorlon> pacemaker-dev is a build-dep of dlm <vorlon> and libesmtp-dev is a build-dep of pacemaker, not the other way around <vorlon> (and dlm is a build-dep of lvm2) <rafaeldtinoco> ah gotcha <rafaeldtinoco> dlm -> corosync -> pacemaker <vorlon> so, even though I removed the binary in error from the release pocket, the right answer is still for pacemaker/i386 binary to go away (leaving only the -dev and lib packages) <vorlon> do you want me to fix that up, or do you want to? <rafaeldtinoco> to fix that we should do like we did to samba ? <vorlon> yeah <vorlon> looks like the binaries you'll need to drop are pacemaker, pacemaker-cli-utils, pacemaker-remote <vorlon> and I'll remove those from -proposed right now, so that those don't hold up migration <vorlon> but I'll hold off on adding the hint until they're dropped from the source <rafaeldtinoco> deal, and next hint ill do with proper branch + """ ** Also affects: pacemaker (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Medium Assignee: Rafael David Tinoco (rafaeldtinoco) Status: In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server, which is subscribed to pacemaker in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863437 Title: [focal] pacemaker i386 should drop a few i386 only packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pacemaker/+bug/1863437/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
