"Daniel Richard G." <sk...@iskunk.org> writes: > No no, the goal is not to have Kerberos users with uid < 1000. It's to > push minimum_uid higher, so that you can have normal 1000-something-uid > local users authenticate without any Kerberos interaction. Same argument > as for the root user and ignore_root.
Oh, sorry. I forgot the context. I even re-read the bug and missed that. Apologies. > As for doing the upgrade, isn't pam-configs/krb5 a conffile? The user > would see what's going on. No, it's not a conffile. The generated /etc/pam.d files are configuration files, but if the user is using the defaults, I believe changes to the defaults are just automatically applied (although Steve would know better than I). And krb5.conf normally isn't updated once written and I don't think it could be updated with this particular type of change. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- Why is /usr/share/pam-configs/krb5 specifying minimum_uid= ? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to kerberos-configs in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
