2012/4/11 Robert Ayrapetyan <robert.ayrapet...@gmail.com> > Seems I've missed confirmation mail somewhere, now registered. > > > > have you patched your 2.6.1 or used trunk + the patch? > I've used trunk + the patch. > > > > I'd be interested in a trace without the patch, to > > see if we're still on the overflow side. > > trunk (rev.3529) "with no patch" log attached. > > Btw I've checked all logs I've sent so far - all of them contain: > > 1.199490 libusb_get_report: Unknown error > 1.199512 Can't retrieve Report 0c: Input/output error > > Seems you are talking about Dmitry's case (overflow). >
you're right: your issues are the same, but BSD doesn't report EOVERFLOW has it should. while Dmitry is running on Linux, the patch should work there. @Robert: could you please run the test again (with wathever version), using debug level 5 (-DDDDD) and doing "export USB_DEBUG=3" before launching the driver? if there is no way to catch overflow on BSD, I fear I'll have to create a driver option to bypass this... cheers, Arno > > > On 04/11/12 16:35, Arnaud Quette wrote: > >> >> 2012/4/11 Robert Ayrapetyan <robert.ayrapet...@gmail.com >> <mailto:robert.ayrapetyan@**gmail.com <robert.ayrapet...@gmail.com>>> >> >> >> Hi. >> >> >> Hi Robert, >> >> please check your subscription. >> I'm still told that you're not subscribed! >> >> Mine output after patch looks same (attached). >> >> >> in fact, it's different. >> It's no more an overflow error, but an I/O error! >> >> have you patched your 2.6.1 or used trunk + the patch? >> in the latter case, I'd be interested in a trace without the patch, to >> see if we're still on the overflow side. >> >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Arnaud Quette >> <aquette....@gmail.com <mailto:aquette....@gmail.com>**> wrote: >> > Hi Robert and Dmitry, >> > >> > I'm crossing LP with the nut mailing list, since this is the same >> EOVERFLOW >> > issue. >> > >> > @Dmitry: it comes out that my previous patch was missing the >> libusb.c part >> > :-/ >> > >> > to both, the attached patch should fix your issue. >> > please send compressed debug output to confirm the fix. >> > >> > I'll have to do some more testing tomorrow since it's "blind >> coded" (Ie, >> > just compiled, not tested with HW) >> > >> > cheers, >> > Arnaud >> >> >> cheers, >> Arnaud >> -- >> Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://powerquality.eaton.com >> Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.** >> org/ <http://www.networkupstools.org/> >> Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org >> Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/ >> >> -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915985 Title: usbhid-ups regression (APC BE525-RS) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nut/+bug/915985/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs