Blueprint changed by James Page: Whiteboard changed: Summary of Discussion at UDS: Current test cases are OK - but all need to be migrated to UTAH early during the Q cycle. Some gaps in upgrade testing - members of the server team to identify suitable test cases so that the QA team can setup more regular upgrade testing. More requirements identified for UTAH - specifically multi-nic and USB install support. Still need to ensure that we get good manual testing coverage at key milestones - ubuntu-server list will be used to call for testing. MAAS test cases need some improvement and automation. Session notes: http://pad.ubuntu.com/uds-q-servercloud-q-server-iso- tests-review Assumptions: - No new tests will be automated using the existing Ubuntu Server ISO Testing Framework. - All existing tests will be migrated by the Platform QA team as UTAH comes online. - Existing test format is still valid for UTAH and existing tests can be extended in place. - The existing upgrade testing framework can support the requirements of the server team. - OpenStack testing is not covered under the scope of this blueprint. - - Preseed based install testing is still sufficient to prove installer testing. + - Preseed based install testing is still sufficient to prove the ISO install experience. - Manual testing still has its place a key points in the development cycle. User Stories: N/A Test Plan: N/A Release Note: N/A
-- Server ISO Tests Review https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/servercloud-q-server-iso-tests-review -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
