Duly noted. On 10/24/07, Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wednesday 24 October 2007 16:52, Gary Wilson wrote: > > I'd add that the originator of the message was very obviously > > inexperienced (as could be seen from the original message) and should > > have been responded to respectively. They needed help. > > I'm going to respectfully disagree. > > If they have a Canonical support contract, then I guess Canonical > employees > may have to stand for that kind of behavior, but not here. > > I think the OP got a considerably kinder reception than their message to > the > list deserved. None of us here are obligated to provide free tech support > to > anyone. > > If I'd been list admin I'd have unsubscribed them with a personal note > requesting they not return until they could use a civil tongue. That > might > have had a shot a teaching the lesson that most needed teaching. > > Scott K > > -- > ubuntu-server mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server > More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam >
-- Firefox (www.getfirefox.com) -- A browser you can trust
-- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
