If this does happen then the qa testing guidelines will have to be updated.
chuck Dustin Kirkland wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 1:08 PM, James Dinkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I would read the documentation on another system then, assuming the >> system referred to is a production server and not a test server. Even >> it there is a viable need for an interactive web browser, I think the >> use case would be so rare and added to the fact that people will have >> differing preferences on which text browser is best, that including >> any one in the default seed is a bad idea. >> > > This sounds reasonable to me. As mentioned above, I think it can be > handled in the Ubuntu Server Guide document with a list of viable text > browser alternatives and a pointer to the apt-get command. > > > :-Dustin > > -- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
