On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:39:33 -0500 Matt Isaacs <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Alberto Sierra > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > what do you guys think? > > > > http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7297/1 > > * > > "Ubuntu Server has one of the cleanest and easiest Linux > > distribution installers. However, in many cases, its designers > > choose to ignore security in favor of ease-of-use. The result? An > > install that is not secure by default."* > > > > However, if the default installer forces too much security, this same > audience may become lost when their system does not behave in the > manner they expect (I am reminded years ago the first time I > encountered an SELinux enabled system...). Well.... I've already had that experiance with apparmour.(it didn't know slapd was allowed to pull its ssl certs from a particular directory. took me a while to find i had a new service to contend with) kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian user / gNewSense contributor http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
