Am Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:13:21 -0500 schrieb Dustin Kirkland <[email protected]>:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 1:10 PM, James Dinkel<[email protected]> wrote: > > After some searching, I think this must be the discussion you are > > talking about: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-02/msg00295.html > > > > I'm linking it here in case anyone else is interested. From that > > discussion and reading elsewhere, it sounds like VirtualBox may be > > the forward solution to virtualization on non-vmx/non-svm hardware. > > > > Does Canonical or any Ubuntu virt developers have any concern for > > virtualization on non-vmx/non-svm hardware? And what do you (they, > > anyone) think of vbox as the Ubuntu solution to fill this void? > > As far as I'm aware, there are no virtualization-on-non-VT-hardware > packages in Ubuntu's main repositories. i.e.. kqemu, vbox, xen are > all in Universe. Canonical traditionally focuses the majority of its > efforts in delivering and supporting the packages in Ubuntu main. > > I have very little experience with Virtual Box. Sorry. > > :-Dustin > I use VBox as "Desktop"-Virtualization. It's working fine. I have not much experiences with VBox as "Server"-Virtualization but VBox has cmdl-tools for creating, modifying, starting and stopping of virtual-machines. VBox has also a built in RDP-Server and you can start guest "Headless" so you don't need X on your Server. Regards, Andreas -- Andreas Rütten mailto : [email protected] PGP DSA/1024, C1CC335C, A655 0268 CEA6 A3DA 30AA D356 A450 30BD C1CC 335C -- -- ubuntu-server mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam
