On Oct 13, 2009 9:19am, [email protected] wrote:
On Oct 13, 2009 2:33am, Thierry Carrez [email protected]> wrote:
> Joseph Salisbury wrote:
>
>
>
> >> All of the steps of the ServerEConfig test case ran without error. However,
>
> >> I was unable to get an instance to start. I issued the command
>
> >> euca-run-instances and the instance had a running status for a short while,
>
> >> but then its status went to terminated.
>
>
>
> Looking at your symptoms, it looks like you hit bug 439410. To confirm,
>
> check if you have "walrus_request(): server responded with HTTP code
>
> 500" in your Node /var/log/eucalyptus/nc.log.

I don't see this message in the nc.log file on the node. However, I do see similar messages that are reported in bug 449158.

[Mon Oct 12 16:24:19 2009][001697][EUCAERROR ] error: file /var/lib/eucalyptus/instances/admin/i-388A0666/disk not found

[Mon Oct 12 16:24:28 2009][001697][EUCAFATAL ] hypervisor failed to start domain [Mon Oct 12 16:24:29 2009][001697][EUCADEBUG ] doDescribeResource() invoked [Mon Oct 12 16:24:29 2009][001697][EUCADEBUG ] doDescribeInstances() invoked [Mon Oct 12 16:24:33 2009][001697][EUCAERROR ] libvirt: Domain not found: no domain with matching name 'i-388A0666' (code=42)

I do not see the file i-388A0666 in the /var/lib/eucalyptus/instances/admin directory. I can re-run this test, and see if the file ever does show up there, but then gets moved or removed.

>
>
>
> This was fixed by the last eucalyptus update (1.6~bzr919-0ubuntu3),
>
> please update and try again.
>
>
>
> > After looking some more, I'm not sure where one of the IP addresses is
>
> > coming from that euca-describe-instances is reporting. Using the
>
> > output from a peviouse post to this thread I see two IP addresses:
>
> > 172.23.46.78 is listed in the fourth column. This is a virtual IP
>
> > address I configured on the cluster. However, I don't know where the
>
> > IP address listed in the fifth column came from (172.19.1.2)? Was
>
> > this generated by Eucalyptus? I did a search and cannot find this IP
>
> > address in any configuration file. I would assume these would be the
>
> > public and private IP addresses.
>
>
>
> The second address is a private one assigned inside the cluster, and
>
> this network is configured in /etc/eucalyptus/eucalyptus.conf.

Great! Thanks for the info. I can see where this is configured now.

>
>
>
> --
>
> Thierry Carrez
>
> Ubuntu server team
>

I noticed one other thing that may or may not be an issue. I installed the x86 version of Karmic on these machines. I set the ARCH variable to i386 when bundling the images. However, when I run euca-describe-images, I see the seventh column mention x86_64:

$ euca-describe-images
IMAGE emi-22F111AC i-20091013143321/karmic-uec-i386.img.manifest.xml admin available public x86_64 machine IMAGE eki-403116B3 k-20091013143321/karmic-uec-i386-vmlinuz-virtual.manifest.xml admin available public x86_64 kernel IMAGE eri-23C9163C r-20091013143321/karmic-uec-i386-initrd-virtual.manifest.xml admin available public x86_64 ramdisk

Is this to be expected?

Joe
-- 
ubuntu-server mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server
More info: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam

Reply via email to